Seek Returns logo

CTVA vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTVA and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CTVA is a standard domestic listing, while SUZ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCTVASUZ
Company NameCorteva, Inc.Suzano S.A.
CountryUnited StatesBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsPaper & Forest Products
Market Capitalization49.55 billion USD12.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 24, 2019November 4, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTVA and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTVA vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTVASUZ
5-Day Price Return1.52%2.21%
13-Week Price Return6.03%1.51%
26-Week Price Return16.07%-8.65%
52-Week Price Return34.34%-3.78%
Month-to-Date Return1.15%3.09%
Year-to-Date Return28.09%-12.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.36M4.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.85M5.47M
3-Month Volatility15.99%23.49%
Beta0.800.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTVA

5.68%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

CTVA’s Return on Equity of 5.68% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.82%
Q3
5.52%
Median
4.14%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-1.81%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTVA

8.16%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

CTVA’s Net Profit Margin of 8.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
18.06%
Q3
11.46%
Median
3.39%
Q1
1.84%
Min
-2.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTVA

13.06%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

CTVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.06% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
31.11%
Q3
16.36%
Median
6.08%
Q1
4.04%
Min
-2.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTVASUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)5.68%20.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.36%4.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.16%15.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)45.65%37.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTVA

1.68

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

CTVA’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.03
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.99

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTVA

0.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, CTVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.82
Median
0.56
Q1
0.27
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTVA

4.45

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

CTVA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
2.72
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTVASUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.683.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.232.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.142.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.450.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTVA vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTVA vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTVA

0.94%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Yield of 0.94% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SUZ

3.79%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.72%
Median
2.41%
Q1
1.71%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTVA

11.80%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.80% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
495.87%
Q3
219.88%
Median
83.21%
Q1
24.91%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTVASUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.94%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.80%15.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTVA

35.37

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 35.37 places CTVA in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SUZ

8.48

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
36.56
Q3
23.55
Median
16.47
Q1
13.85
Min
5.22

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 8.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTVA

2.89

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

CTVA’s P/S Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SUZ

1.29

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.15
Q3
1.30
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.30

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTVA

1.96

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

CTVA’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.25
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.25

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CTVA vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTVASUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.378.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.891.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.961.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.2811.53