Seek Returns logo

CTRA vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTRA and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTRASLB
Company NameCoterra Energy Inc.SLB N.V.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization20.13 billion USD54.57 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 8, 1990December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTRA and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTRA vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTRASLB
5-Day Price Return-0.19%0.08%
13-Week Price Return9.61%11.97%
26-Week Price Return6.38%2.30%
52-Week Price Return2.85%-15.26%
Month-to-Date Return11.33%2.44%
Year-to-Date Return3.13%-3.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.64M13.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.17M16.56M
3-Month Volatility27.81%29.30%
Beta0.330.74

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTRA

11.62%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

CTRA’s Return on Equity of 11.62% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SLB

16.84%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
29.69%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.04%

SLB’s Return on Equity of 16.84% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTRA

23.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.25% places CTRA in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SLB

10.34%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.51%
Q3
8.94%
Median
5.91%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-2.81%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.34% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTRA

31.17%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.17% places CTRA in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SLB

13.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
33.80%
Q3
17.55%
Median
11.05%
Q1
4.67%
Min
-1.49%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTRASLB
Return on Equity (TTM)11.62%16.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.04%7.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.25%10.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.17%13.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.81%19.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTRA

1.02

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

CTRA’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SLB

1.39

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
2.08
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.70

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTRA

0.27

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

CTRA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SLB

0.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.06
Median
0.48
Q1
0.33
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTRA

75.72

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 75.72, CTRA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
27.00
Median
9.96
Q1
2.52
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTRASLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.021.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.981.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.270.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)75.7243.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTRA vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTRA vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTRA

3.34%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

CTRA’s Dividend Yield of 3.34% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SLB

2.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
7.69%
Q3
4.11%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.24%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Yield of 2.86% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTRA

40.64%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

CTRA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.64% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SLB

42.94%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
97.80%
Median
44.61%
Q1
15.01%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.94% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTRASLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.34%2.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.64%42.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTRA

12.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

CTRA’s P/E Ratio of 12.18 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SLB

15.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
26.39
Q3
20.56
Median
14.49
Q1
10.91
Min
7.44

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 15.00 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTRA

2.83

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

CTRA’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SLB

1.55

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.59
Median
0.89
Q1
0.57
Min
0.20

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTRA

1.23

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

CTRA’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SLB

2.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.69
Median
1.77
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.00 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CTRA vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTRASLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.1815.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.831.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.232.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.8513.38