Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASVRT
Company NameCintas CorporationVertiv Holdings Co
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization90.71 billion USD52.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRT
5-Day Price Return0.76%-1.43%
13-Week Price Return3.74%35.97%
26-Week Price Return10.19%14.92%
52-Week Price Return18.53%88.37%
Month-to-Date Return1.15%-5.63%
Year-to-Date Return23.21%20.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.34M6.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.61M8.39M
3-Month Volatility17.15%42.29%
Beta1.021.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.091.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.702.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.68%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.10%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.68%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

49.83

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 49.83 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRT

66.31

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 66.31 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

8.73

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.73, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRT

5.92

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.92 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.8366.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.735.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5015.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)51.3943.36