Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASVRSK
Company NameCintas CorporationVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization74.69 billion USD30.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRSK
5-Day Price Return0.79%1.36%
13-Week Price Return-13.78%-19.42%
26-Week Price Return-13.29%-28.43%
52-Week Price Return-16.50%-25.58%
Month-to-Date Return1.88%-1.33%
Year-to-Date Return2.20%-21.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.38M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.95M1.29M
3-Month Volatility18.57%30.74%
Beta0.970.81

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

40.41%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.86%
Q3
17.95%
Median
10.20%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 40.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

404.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 404.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.54%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.54%
Q3
10.35%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.54% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.42%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.89%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
25.57%
Q3
15.63%
Median
8.06%
Q1
4.76%
Min
-7.48%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.89% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

44.45%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 44.45% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)40.41%404.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.17%18.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.54%30.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.89%44.45%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.10%69.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.24

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.24
Median
1.28
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.24 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSK

1.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.51

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.11
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSK

12.52

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.52, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
24.47
Median
9.83
Q1
3.74
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.241.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.881.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.5112.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.7043.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.89%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VRSK

0.82%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.82% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

34.09%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
50.54%
Q1
29.39%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.09% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

26.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.40% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)34.09%26.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

40.29

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.06
Q3
35.30
Median
21.86
Q1
16.24
Min
6.18

A P/E Ratio of 40.29 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRSK

32.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

VRSK’s P/E Ratio of 32.20 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

7.07

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.55
Q3
3.15
Median
1.07
Q1
0.68
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.07, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRSK

9.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 9.79, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

17.80

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.18
Q3
4.19
Median
2.44
Q1
1.61
Min
0.40

At 17.80, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

93.28

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

At 93.28, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.2932.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.079.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.8093.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.9826.59