Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASRKLB
Company NameCintas CorporationRocket Lab Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization82.30 billion USD23.22 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqCM
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983November 24, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. RKLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASRKLB
5-Day Price Return2.61%2.87%
13-Week Price Return-7.90%39.73%
26-Week Price Return0.27%160.42%
52-Week Price Return1.44%393.01%
Month-to-Date Return-2.27%0.13%
Year-to-Date Return12.35%88.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.47M23.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.67M22.98M
3-Month Volatility18.58%73.87%
Beta1.002.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RKLB

-48.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -48.14%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

RKLB

-45.87%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -45.87%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RKLB

-44.08%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -44.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASRKLB
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%-48.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%-17.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%-45.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%-44.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%29.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RKLB

2.67

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 2.67 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RKLB

0.63

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.63 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASRKLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.092.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.712.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.63
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.70-45.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.75% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASRKLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.75%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

45.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 45.27 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKLB

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

7.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.94, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RKLB

46.04

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 46.04, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB

23.97

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 23.97, RKLB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASRKLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.27--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.9446.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5023.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.70--