CTAS vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at CTAS and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | CTAS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Cintas Corporation | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Commercial Services & Supplies | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 74.69 billion USD | 64.57 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
| Listing Date | August 19, 1983 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of CTAS and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | CTAS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 0.79% | -4.68% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -13.78% | 12.73% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -13.29% | 24.95% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -16.50% | 31.33% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 1.88% | -4.42% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 2.20% | 35.83% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.38M | 0.91M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.95M | 1.05M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 18.57% | 32.01% |
| Beta | 0.97 | 1.16 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
CTAS
40.41%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 31.86%
- Q3
- 17.95%
- Median
- 10.20%
- Q1
- 6.64%
- Min
- -9.69%
CTAS’s Return on Equity of 40.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
PWR
13.12%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.67%
- Median
- 11.05%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -2.38%
PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.12% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
CTAS
17.54%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 17.54%
- Q3
- 10.35%
- Median
- 5.85%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -2.31%
A Net Profit Margin of 17.54% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
PWR
3.74%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.49%
- Median
- 3.88%
- Q1
- 2.38%
- Min
- -2.27%
PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
CTAS
22.89%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 25.57%
- Q3
- 15.63%
- Median
- 8.06%
- Q1
- 4.76%
- Min
- -7.48%
An Operating Profit Margin of 22.89% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
PWR
5.81%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.70%
- Median
- 5.84%
- Q1
- 3.94%
- Min
- -1.78%
PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.81% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | CTAS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 40.41% | 13.12% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 19.17% | 5.06% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 17.54% | 3.74% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 22.89% | 5.81% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 50.10% | 15.16% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CTAS
2.24
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 3.94
- Q3
- 2.24
- Median
- 1.28
- Q1
- 0.91
- Min
- 0.58
CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.24 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
PWR
1.34
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.26
- Q3
- 1.54
- Median
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.65
PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
CTAS
0.51
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 2.24
- Q3
- 1.11
- Median
- 0.73
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
PWR
0.67
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.54
- Q3
- 1.33
- Median
- 0.64
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
CTAS
24.70
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 24.70
- Q3
- 24.47
- Median
- 9.83
- Q1
- 3.74
- Min
- -10.97
CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
PWR
10.76
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 30.69
- Q3
- 15.27
- Median
- 7.88
- Q1
- 4.27
- Min
- -6.49
PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | CTAS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.24 | 1.34 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.88 | 1.23 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.51 | 0.67 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 24.70 | 10.76 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CTAS
0.85%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 4.46%
- Q3
- 2.38%
- Median
- 1.70%
- Q1
- 0.89%
- Min
- 0.00%
CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
PWR
0.09%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 1.76%
- Q1
- 0.17%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CTAS
34.09%
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 137.88%
- Q3
- 72.93%
- Median
- 50.54%
- Q1
- 29.39%
- Min
- 0.00%
CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.09% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
PWR
5.78%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 144.77%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 50.47%
- Q1
- 8.02%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.78% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | CTAS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.85% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 34.09% | 5.78% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
CTAS
40.29
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 57.06
- Q3
- 35.30
- Median
- 21.86
- Q1
- 16.24
- Min
- 6.18
A P/E Ratio of 40.29 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.
PWR
62.88
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 39.16
- Q3
- 24.60
- Median
- 17.05
- Q1
- 13.85
- Min
- 1.65
At 62.88, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
CTAS
7.07
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 6.55
- Q3
- 3.15
- Median
- 1.07
- Q1
- 0.68
- Min
- 0.06
With a P/S Ratio of 7.07, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
PWR
2.35
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.86
- Q3
- 1.52
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.12
PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.35 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
CTAS
17.80
Commercial Services & Supplies Industry
- Max
- 6.18
- Q3
- 4.19
- Median
- 2.44
- Q1
- 1.61
- Min
- 0.40
At 17.80, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
PWR
7.36
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.53
- Q3
- 3.97
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.24
PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.36 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | CTAS | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 40.29 | 62.88 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 7.07 | 2.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 17.80 | 7.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 43.98 | 51.14 |