Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. PONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and PONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CTAS is a standard domestic listing, while PONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCTASPONY
Company NameCintas CorporationPony AI Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesSoftware
Market Capitalization87.34 billion USD5.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983November 27, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and PONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. PONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASPONY
5-Day Price Return-2.09%-7.74%
13-Week Price Return-2.82%-14.46%
26-Week Price Return5.21%-19.22%
52-Week Price Return12.15%--
Month-to-Date Return-2.62%10.04%
Year-to-Date Return18.63%3.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.46M8.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.47M12.64M
3-Month Volatility17.47%114.76%
Beta1.032.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PONY

-41.07%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

PONY has a negative Return on Equity of -41.07%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PONY

-521.79%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

PONY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -521.79%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PONY

-567.77%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

PONY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -567.77%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASPONY
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%-41.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%-36.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%-521.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%-567.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%24.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PONY

6.19

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

PONY’s Current Ratio of 6.19 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PONY

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

PONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PONY

--

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASPONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.096.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.715.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.70--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. PONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. PONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PONY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PONY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASPONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.70%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

48.29

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 48.29 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PONY

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

8.46

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.46, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PONY

76.97

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 76.97, PONY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PONY

5.50

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

PONY’s P/B Ratio of 5.50 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CTAS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASPONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.29--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.4676.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.505.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.80--