Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASMMM
Company NameCintas Corporation3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization85.37 billion USD83.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASMMM
5-Day Price Return-2.11%0.98%
13-Week Price Return-4.42%4.05%
26-Week Price Return1.79%3.76%
52-Week Price Return8.00%21.19%
Month-to-Date Return-4.80%4.44%
Year-to-Date Return15.96%20.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.69M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.48M3.40M
3-Month Volatility17.61%23.22%
Beta1.021.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.091.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.523.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.70-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.70%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

48.29

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 48.29 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

8.46

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.46, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.2920.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.463.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5018.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.8030.86