Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASLMT
Company NameCintas CorporationLockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization87.34 billion USD104.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASLMT
5-Day Price Return-2.09%1.98%
13-Week Price Return-2.82%-5.72%
26-Week Price Return5.21%2.59%
52-Week Price Return12.15%-20.13%
Month-to-Date Return-2.62%5.94%
Year-to-Date Return18.63%-8.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.46M1.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.47M1.66M
3-Month Volatility17.47%30.65%
Beta1.030.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.090.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.710.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.524.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.707.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT

2.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.70%2.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

48.29

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 48.29 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LMT

24.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.64 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

8.46

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.46, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LMT

1.44

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.2924.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.461.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5020.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.8020.78