Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. GWW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and GWW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASGWW
Company NameCintas CorporationW.W. Grainger, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization80.20 billion USD45.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and GWW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. GWW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASGWW
5-Day Price Return-3.03%0.62%
13-Week Price Return-8.50%-7.26%
26-Week Price Return-4.25%-3.54%
52-Week Price Return-2.69%-6.83%
Month-to-Date Return-3.03%0.62%
Year-to-Date Return8.94%-9.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.00M0.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.69M0.30M
3-Month Volatility16.81%27.70%
Beta0.991.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASGWW
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%54.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%21.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%10.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%15.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%39.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASGWW
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.092.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.7034.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.76%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GWW

0.96%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASGWW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%22.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

44.55

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 44.55 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GWW

23.91

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.91 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

7.81

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.81, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GWW

2.63

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASGWW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)44.5523.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.812.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5013.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.9532.45