Seek Returns logo

CSX vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSX and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSXSTN
Company NameCSX CorporationStantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization67.26 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 3, 1980August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSX and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSX vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSXSTN
5-Day Price Return2.35%-0.96%
13-Week Price Return19.04%14.45%
26-Week Price Return10.20%37.34%
52-Week Price Return7.70%38.53%
Month-to-Date Return1.52%-0.75%
Year-to-Date Return11.81%33.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume16.48M0.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.92M0.27M
3-Month Volatility21.22%18.10%
Beta1.300.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSX

24.83%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

CSX’s Return on Equity of 24.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSX

21.91%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.91% places CSX in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.63% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSX

33.80%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.80% places CSX in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.84% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSXSTN
Return on Equity (TTM)24.83%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.22%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.91%7.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.80%9.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.73%66.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

0.77

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

CSX’s Current Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

1.55

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

CSX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.55. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSX

7.10

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

CSX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSXSTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.771.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.550.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.1060.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSX vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSX vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSX

1.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

CSX’s Dividend Yield of 1.42% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STN

0.56%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.56% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSX

30.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

CSX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.63% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN

20.71%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.71% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSXSTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.42%0.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.63%20.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSX

21.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

CSX’s P/E Ratio of 21.51 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN

37.15

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 37.15, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSX

4.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.71, CSX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STN

2.83

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

4.95

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

CSX’s P/B Ratio of 4.95 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSX vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSXSTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.5137.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.712.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.954.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.7731.05