Seek Returns logo

CSX vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSX and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSXGFL
Company NameCSX CorporationGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization65.01 billion USD16.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 3, 1980March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSX and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSX vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSXGFL
5-Day Price Return-0.63%1.37%
13-Week Price Return-3.91%-10.30%
26-Week Price Return14.28%-8.64%
52-Week Price Return-4.33%1.90%
Month-to-Date Return-3.11%1.42%
Year-to-Date Return8.15%-2.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.83M0.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.12M0.41M
3-Month Volatility23.41%18.18%
Beta1.310.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSX

23.31%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

In the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, CSX’s Return on Equity of 23.31% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFL

47.67%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.86%
Q3
17.95%
Median
10.20%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 47.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSX

20.55%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.55% places CSX in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

52.22%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.54%
Q3
10.35%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 52.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSX

31.98%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.98% places CSX in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL

6.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
25.57%
Q3
15.63%
Median
8.06%
Q1
4.76%
Min
-7.48%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.00% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSXGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)23.31%47.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.74%18.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.55%52.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.98%6.00%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.17%20.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

0.85

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

CSX’s Current Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFL

0.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.24
Median
1.28
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.69 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

1.50

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

CSX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.50 is typical for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL

1.03

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.11
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSX

7.10

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

CSX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
24.47
Median
9.83
Q1
3.74
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSXGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.69
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.710.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.501.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.10-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSX vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSX vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSX

1.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

CSX’s Dividend Yield of 1.49% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL

0.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.89%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSX

33.08%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

CSX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.08% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

0.62%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
50.54%
Q1
29.39%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.62% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSXGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.49%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.08%0.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSX

22.21

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

CSX’s P/E Ratio of 22.21 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

6.18

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.06
Q3
35.30
Median
21.86
Q1
16.24
Min
6.18

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 6.18 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSX

4.56

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 4.56, CSX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GFL

3.23

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.55
Q3
3.15
Median
1.07
Q1
0.68
Min
0.06

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.23 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

5.19

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

CSX’s P/B Ratio of 5.19 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFL

3.13

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.18
Q3
4.19
Median
2.44
Q1
1.61
Min
0.40

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.13 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSX vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSXGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.216.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.563.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.193.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.0660.89