Seek Returns logo

CSX vs. FER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSX and FER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSXFER
Company NameCSX CorporationFerrovial SE
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization65.25 billion USD41.98 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 3, 1980August 13, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSX and FER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSX vs. FER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSXFER
5-Day Price Return3.61%0.99%
13-Week Price Return4.57%8.93%
26-Week Price Return16.98%16.31%
52-Week Price Return1.36%27.56%
Month-to-Date Return-1.44%4.48%
Year-to-Date Return8.46%20.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.02M0.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.63M0.64M
3-Month Volatility25.14%13.81%
Beta1.310.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSX

24.83%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

CSX’s Return on Equity of 24.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSX

21.91%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.91% places CSX in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSX

33.80%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.80% places CSX in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSXFER
Return on Equity (TTM)24.83%56.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.22%12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.91%35.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.80%34.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.73%87.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

0.77

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

CSX’s Current Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

1.55

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

CSX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.55. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSX

7.10

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

CSX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSXFER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.770.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.551.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.109.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSX vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSX vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSX

1.45%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

CSX’s Dividend Yield of 1.45% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FER

0.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.35% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSX

30.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

CSX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.63% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSXFER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.45%0.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.63%3.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSX

21.06

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

CSX’s P/E Ratio of 21.06 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER

10.41

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.41 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSX

4.61

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.61, CSX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FER

3.75

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.75, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSX

4.95

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

CSX’s P/B Ratio of 4.95 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSX vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSXFER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0610.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.613.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.955.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.2430.55