Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLVRSK
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization13.04 billion USD30.56 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLVRSK
5-Day Price Return-3.60%1.36%
13-Week Price Return-19.63%-19.42%
26-Week Price Return-23.44%-28.43%
52-Week Price Return-32.60%-25.58%
Month-to-Date Return-5.69%-1.33%
Year-to-Date Return-16.89%-21.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.47M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.52M1.29M
3-Month Volatility30.93%30.74%
Beta0.970.81

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

35.51%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.23%
Median
14.24%
Q1
8.89%
Min
-11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 35.51% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRSK

404.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 404.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

15.48%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.69%
Q3
13.95%
Median
8.32%
Q1
4.11%
Min
-8.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.48% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.42%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

20.67%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.30%
Q3
17.93%
Median
12.09%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.67% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

44.45%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 44.45% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)35.51%404.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.36%18.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.48%30.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.67%44.45%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.24%69.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

3.25

Building Products Industry

Max
2.78
Q3
1.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.31
Min
0.93

CSL’s Current Ratio of 3.25 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Building Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VRSK

1.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

1.45

Building Products Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
1.01
Median
0.62
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

CSL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

12.52

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.52, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
-2.48

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.251.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.621.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.4512.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.4543.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
3.92%
Q3
2.12%
Median
1.27%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.82%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.82% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

23.23%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.96%
Q1
18.92%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.23% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

26.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.40% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.41%0.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.23%26.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

16.47

Building Products Industry

Max
41.45
Q3
26.91
Median
22.23
Q1
16.60
Min
9.49

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VRSK

32.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

VRSK’s P/E Ratio of 32.20 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

2.55

Building Products Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
2.85
Median
1.60
Q1
0.96
Min
0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSK

9.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 9.79, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.06

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.57
Median
2.89
Q1
1.85
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VRSK

93.28

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

At 93.28, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4732.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.559.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.0693.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.9726.59