Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. UNP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and UNP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLUNP
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedUnion Pacific Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsGround Transportation
Market Capitalization14.17 billion USD139.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and UNP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. UNP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLUNP
5-Day Price Return-0.89%2.61%
13-Week Price Return-11.90%2.73%
26-Week Price Return-5.14%-0.70%
52-Week Price Return-26.01%-3.21%
Month-to-Date Return-14.75%5.73%
Year-to-Date Return-10.81%3.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.68M5.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.49M4.26M
3-Month Volatility44.78%19.15%
Beta1.011.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLUNP
Return on Equity (TTM)33.90%42.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.86%10.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.12%28.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%40.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.92%79.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLUNP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.190.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.892.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.458.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.26%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNP

2.31%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.31% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLUNP
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.26%2.31%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.20%46.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

17.67

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 17.67 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNP

20.10

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 20.10 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

2.85

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UNP

5.71

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 5.71, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLUNP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.6720.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.855.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.628.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.0822.26