CSL vs. UAL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CSL and UAL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CSL	UAL
Company Name	Carlisle Companies Incorporated	United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Passenger Airlines
Market Capitalization	17.06 billion USD	32.31 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	February 6, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and UAL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. UAL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CSL	UAL
5-Day Price Return	12.56%	13.42%
13-Week Price Return	-0.51%	26.93%
26-Week Price Return	14.20%	-8.58%
52-Week Price Return	3.92%	146.88%
Month-to-Date Return	12.48%	13.00%
Year-to-Date Return	8.17%	2.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.63M	5.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.47M	8.22M
3-Month Volatility	40.60%	53.42%
Beta	1.04	1.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UAL

26.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

UAL’s Return on Equity of 26.43% is on par with the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UAL

5.71%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

UAL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UAL

8.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

UAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CSL	UAL
Return on Equity (TTM)	33.90%	26.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)	13.86%	4.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.12%	5.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	21.17%	8.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	36.92%	64.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UAL

0.70

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

UAL’s Current Ratio of 0.70 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UAL

2.02

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

UAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02 is typical for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UAL

5.76

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

UAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CSL	UAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.19	0.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.47	0.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.89	2.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	86.45	5.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. UAL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. UAL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.07%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

UAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

UAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CSL	UAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.07%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	22.20%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

20.80

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 20.80 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UAL

9.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

UAL’s P/E Ratio of 9.75 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

3.35

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UAL

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

UAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UAL

1.94

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

UAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.94 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CSL	UAL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.80	9.75
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.35	0.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.62	1.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	18.93	7.98