CSL vs. SNA: Carlisle vs. Snap-on Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while SNA is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Profile Item	CSL	SNA
Name	Carlisle Companies Incorporated	Snap-on Incorporated
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	14.52 billion USD	18.94 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CSL

SNA

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
Total Return (1Y)	24.99%	12.48%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	15.85%	15.36%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	12.02%	14.84%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CSL

SNA

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	38.46%	19.41%
Beta (5Y)	0.76	0.73
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-37.72%	-20.77%
Avg. Volume (3M)	509.16K	333.56K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CSL and SNA are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.54	0.42
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.87	0.63

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Snap-on (SNA) at 17.32%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

42.34%

CSL: 42.34%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

17.32%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
SNA: 17.32%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and Snap-on (SNA) at 19.21% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

13.78%

Max: 27.47%
CSL: 13.78%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

19.21%

Max: 27.47%
SNA: 19.21%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and Snap-on (SNA) at 24.88% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

20.21%

Max: 36.60%
CSL: 20.21%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

24.88%

Max: 36.60%
SNA: 24.88%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
ROE (TTM)	42.34%	17.32%
ROA (TTM)	10.20%	9.70%
Net Margin (TTM)	13.78%	19.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)	20.21%	24.88%
Gross Margin (TTM)	34.66%	51.87%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% and Snap-on (SNA) at 0.93% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Snap-on (SNA) at -1.64% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
Revenue Growth (YoY)	0.33%	0.93%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-2.70%	2.11%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-38.46%	-1.64%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.84%	4.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Snap-on (SNA) at 3.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
CSL: 2.41
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.55

Max: 5.22
SNA: 3.55
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 0.21 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.01

Max: 2.33
CSL: 2.01
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

0.21

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
SNA: 0.21
Min: 0.00

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.41	3.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	2.01	0.21
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.93	-0.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% and Snap-on (SNA) at 2.66% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

1.20%

Max: 2.66%
CSL: 1.20%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

2.66%

SNA: 2.66%
Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Snap-on (SNA) at 50.70% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

25.50%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
CSL: 25.50%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

50.70%

Max: 67.39%
SNA: 50.70%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.20%	2.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	25.50%	50.70%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 19.08 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SNA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

21.06

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
CSL: 21.06
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

19.08

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
SNA: 19.08
Min: 3.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 and Snap-on (SNA) at 3.60 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.79

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
CSL: 2.79
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.60

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
SNA: 3.60
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 prices above its benchmark range — CSL looks rich relative to book.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

10.11

CSL: 10.11
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.11

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
SNA: 3.11
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Snap-on (SNA)
Metric	CSL	SNA
P/E Ratio (TTM)	21.06	19.08
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.79	3.60
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	10.11	3.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.01%	5.77%