Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLLUV
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedSouthwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization16.40 billion USD16.38 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLLUV
5-Day Price Return-1.93%1.56%
13-Week Price Return-5.50%-4.33%
26-Week Price Return6.39%4.18%
52-Week Price Return-6.00%16.65%
Month-to-Date Return8.16%0.81%
Year-to-Date Return4.02%-7.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.43M7.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.45M11.72M
3-Month Volatility40.87%40.41%
Beta1.031.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLLUV
Return on Equity (TTM)33.90%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.86%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.12%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.92%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLLUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.190.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.890.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.459.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.09%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.09% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LUV

2.58%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.58% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLLUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.09%2.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.20%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

20.40

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 20.40 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV

42.24

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 42.24, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

3.29

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 3.29 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LUV

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLLUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.4042.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.290.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.622.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.5744.16