Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLGFL
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization17.06 billion USD18.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLGFL
5-Day Price Return12.56%0.03%
13-Week Price Return-0.51%0.56%
26-Week Price Return14.20%6.77%
52-Week Price Return3.92%25.67%
Month-to-Date Return12.48%-0.39%
Year-to-Date Return8.17%8.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.63M0.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.47M0.37M
3-Month Volatility40.60%22.39%
Beta1.040.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)33.90%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.86%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.12%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.92%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.190.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.890.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.45-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.07%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%0.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.20%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

20.80

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 20.80 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

7.07

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.07 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

3.35

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL

3.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.52 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.807.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.353.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.623.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9376.96