Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. EME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and EME, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLEME
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedEMCOR Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization17.06 billion USD27.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 10, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and EME by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. EME: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLEME
5-Day Price Return12.56%-0.13%
13-Week Price Return-0.51%34.86%
26-Week Price Return14.20%32.01%
52-Week Price Return3.92%73.33%
Month-to-Date Return12.48%-1.72%
Year-to-Date Return8.17%35.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.63M0.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.47M0.47M
3-Month Volatility40.60%29.57%
Beta1.041.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLEME
Return on Equity (TTM)33.90%37.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.86%14.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.12%7.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%9.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.92%19.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLEME
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.191.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.471.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.890.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.45490.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.07%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLEME
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.20%4.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

20.80

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 20.80 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EME

24.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.61 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

3.35

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EME

1.74

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSL vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLEME
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.8024.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.351.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.627.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9322.51