Seek Returns logo

CSGP vs. SUI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSGP and SUI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that CSGP is a conventional stock, whereas SUI is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolCSGPSUI
Company NameCoStar Group, Inc.Sun Communities, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentResidential REITs
Market Capitalization37.09 billion USD16.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998December 9, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSGP and SUI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSGP vs. SUI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSGPSUI
5-Day Price Return-8.16%2.38%
13-Week Price Return16.16%2.35%
26-Week Price Return11.98%2.13%
52-Week Price Return21.56%-1.64%
Month-to-Date Return-8.02%3.20%
Year-to-Date Return22.31%4.09%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.16M1.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.21M0.91M
3-Month Volatility25.20%23.73%
Beta0.890.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSGP

1.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SUI

17.50%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

SUI’s Return on Equity of 17.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

3.57%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 3.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SUI

47.05%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

-0.22%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SUI

-0.66%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSGPSUI
Return on Equity (TTM)1.29%17.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.06%8.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.57%47.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.22%-0.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.33%49.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

5.83

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 5.83 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SUI

4.21

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

SUI’s Current Ratio of 4.21 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SUI

0.56

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

Falling into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SUI

1.17

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSGPSUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.834.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.723.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.651.17

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSGP vs. SUI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSGP vs. SUI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SUI

6.48%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

SUI’s Dividend Yield of 6.48% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SUI

49.16%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

SUI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSGPSUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%49.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

344.90

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

At 344.90, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SUI

12.05

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

12.33

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

With a P/S Ratio of 12.33, CSGP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SUI

5.67

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s P/S Ratio of 5.67 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

3.94

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 3.94, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SUI

2.11

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

SUI’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSGP vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSGPSUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)344.9012.05
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.335.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.942.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)1,218.2520.01