Seek Returns logo

CSGP vs. PLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSGP and PLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that CSGP is a conventional stock, whereas PLD is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolCSGPPLD
Company NameCoStar Group, Inc.Prologis, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentIndustrial REITs
Market Capitalization28.88 billion USD115.62 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998November 21, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSGP and PLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSGP vs. PLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSGPPLD
5-Day Price Return1.22%-2.17%
13-Week Price Return-24.10%17.15%
26-Week Price Return-9.48%14.80%
52-Week Price Return-10.19%7.64%
Month-to-Date Return-1.10%-0.46%
Year-to-Date Return-4.94%16.86%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.58M3.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.24M3.56M
3-Month Volatility29.52%25.10%
Beta0.841.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSGP

0.24%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
19.92%
Q3
9.68%
Median
3.86%
Q1
0.61%
Min
-8.89%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 0.24% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PLD

6.03%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
11.16%
Q3
7.81%
Median
6.03%
Q1
4.59%
Min
2.83%

PLD’s Return on Equity of 6.03% is on par with the norm for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

0.66%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
69.53%
Q3
31.03%
Median
9.23%
Q1
2.36%
Min
-23.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PLD

36.70%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
110.51%
Q3
64.42%
Median
43.50%
Q1
32.91%
Min
-3.30%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

-2.65%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.67%
Median
24.95%
Q1
7.35%
Min
-44.62%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PLD

39.78%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
105.87%
Q3
69.30%
Median
51.16%
Q1
39.53%
Min
1.61%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSGPPLD
Return on Equity (TTM)0.24%6.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.20%3.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.66%36.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.65%39.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.25%75.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

3.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.40
Q3
2.38
Median
1.52
Q1
1.02
Min
0.06

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 3.12 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PLD

0.20

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.33
Q3
0.67
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.13

PLD’s Current Ratio of 0.20 aligns with the median group of the Industrial REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.33
Median
0.82
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PLD

0.67

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.83
Median
0.69
Q1
0.46
Min
0.26

PLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
30.61
Q3
14.23
Median
3.84
Q1
1.74
Min
-1.97

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PLD

14.64

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
14.64
Q3
8.51
Median
2.14
Q1
0.80
Min
-0.82

PLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.64 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSGPPLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.120.20
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.970.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.6514.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSGP vs. PLD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSGP vs. PLD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.29%
Q3
3.64%
Median
2.24%
Q1
0.56%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PLD

3.18%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
8.42%
Q3
5.89%
Median
4.01%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

PLD’s Dividend Yield of 3.18% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
290.47%
Q3
140.89%
Median
56.37%
Q1
29.04%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PLD

115.85%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
184.24%
Q3
119.72%
Median
108.21%
Q1
59.56%
Min
0.00%

PLD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 115.85% is within the typical range for the Industrial REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSGPPLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%115.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

1,422.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.78
Q3
29.72
Median
15.84
Q1
10.97
Min
3.65

At 1,422.10, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PLD

36.42

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
37.96
Q3
30.12
Median
20.84
Q1
15.09
Min
5.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Industrial REITs industry.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

9.45

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
11.86
Q3
5.68
Median
2.97
Q1
1.01
Min
0.05

CSGP’s P/S Ratio of 9.45 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PLD

13.37

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
14.19
Q3
11.67
Median
9.17
Q1
7.65
Min
5.47

PLD’s P/S Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

4.15

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.48
Q3
1.23
Median
0.74
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 4.15, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PLD

2.02

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.46
Median
1.15
Q1
0.92
Min
0.73

PLD’s P/B Ratio of 2.02 is in the upper tier for the Industrial REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSGP vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSGPPLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1,422.1036.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.4513.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.152.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)978.60135.50