Seek Returns logo

CSGP vs. MAA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSGP and MAA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that CSGP is a conventional stock, whereas MAA is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolCSGPMAA
Company NameCoStar Group, Inc.Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentResidential REITs
Market Capitalization28.88 billion USD15.67 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998January 28, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSGP and MAA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSGP vs. MAA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSGPMAA
5-Day Price Return1.22%1.07%
13-Week Price Return-24.10%-7.07%
26-Week Price Return-9.48%-18.64%
52-Week Price Return-10.19%-18.84%
Month-to-Date Return-1.10%2.11%
Year-to-Date Return-4.94%-15.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.58M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.24M0.90M
3-Month Volatility29.52%17.05%
Beta0.840.78

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSGP

0.24%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
19.92%
Q3
9.68%
Median
3.86%
Q1
0.61%
Min
-8.89%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 0.24% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MAA

9.39%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
15.13%
Q3
9.79%
Median
6.73%
Q1
5.85%
Min
0.65%

MAA’s Return on Equity of 9.39% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

0.66%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
69.53%
Q3
31.03%
Median
9.23%
Q1
2.36%
Min
-23.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MAA

25.23%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
49.84%
Q3
42.29%
Median
25.23%
Q1
17.15%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

-2.65%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.67%
Median
24.95%
Q1
7.35%
Min
-44.62%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MAA

28.02%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
56.43%
Q3
48.20%
Median
28.02%
Q1
18.72%
Min
-7.36%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSGPMAA
Return on Equity (TTM)0.24%9.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.20%4.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.66%25.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.65%28.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.25%58.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

3.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.40
Q3
2.38
Median
1.52
Q1
1.02
Min
0.06

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 3.12 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MAA

0.09

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.72
Median
0.19
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

MAA’s Current Ratio of 0.09 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.33
Median
0.82
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MAA

0.89

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.11
Median
0.82
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

MAA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
30.61
Q3
14.23
Median
3.84
Q1
1.74
Min
-1.97

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MAA

4.01

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

MAA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSGPMAA
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.120.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.970.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.654.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSGP vs. MAA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSGP vs. MAA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.29%
Q3
3.64%
Median
2.24%
Q1
0.56%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MAA

4.61%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.50%
Q3
4.61%
Median
3.94%
Q1
3.53%
Min
2.40%

MAA’s Dividend Yield of 4.61% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
290.47%
Q3
140.89%
Median
56.37%
Q1
29.04%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MAA

127.19%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
277.28%
Q3
165.36%
Median
103.47%
Q1
84.26%
Min
24.03%

MAA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 127.19% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSGPMAA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%127.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

1,422.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.78
Q3
29.72
Median
15.84
Q1
10.97
Min
3.65

At 1,422.10, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MAA

27.57

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.82
Q3
37.09
Median
28.15
Q1
19.50
Min
7.75

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

9.45

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
11.86
Q3
5.68
Median
2.97
Q1
1.01
Min
0.05

CSGP’s P/S Ratio of 9.45 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MAA

6.96

Residential REITs Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
8.35
Median
6.96
Q1
6.23
Min
4.99

MAA’s P/S Ratio of 6.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

4.15

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.48
Q3
1.23
Median
0.74
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 4.15, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MAA

2.80

Residential REITs Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
2.52
Median
2.04
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

MAA’s P/B Ratio of 2.80 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSGP vs. MAA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSGPMAA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1,422.1027.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.456.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.152.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)978.6062.03