CSGP vs. IRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at CSGP and IRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
A key difference in structure is that CSGP is a conventional stock, whereas IRM is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.
| Symbol | CSGP | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | CoStar Group, Inc. | Iron Mountain Incorporated |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| GICS Industry | Real Estate Management & Development | Specialized REITs |
| Market Capitalization | 28.49 billion USD | 30.25 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 1, 1998 | February 1, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | REIT |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of CSGP and IRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | CSGP | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -3.67% | -0.96% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -27.32% | 14.27% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -10.76% | 5.16% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -11.89% | -12.48% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -2.30% | -0.60% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -6.09% | -2.64% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 6.04M | 1.67M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.16M | 1.39M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 30.35% | 27.38% |
| Beta | 0.84 | 1.14 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
CSGP
0.24%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 20.58%
- Q3
- 9.51%
- Median
- 3.59%
- Q1
- 0.57%
- Min
- -9.76%
CSGP’s Return on Equity of 0.24% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
IRM
85.19%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 21.01%
- Q3
- 17.78%
- Median
- 8.42%
- Q1
- 6.83%
- Min
- -1.71%
IRM’s Return on Equity of 85.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
CSGP
0.66%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 61.27%
- Q3
- 26.17%
- Median
- 9.35%
- Q1
- 2.35%
- Min
- -23.71%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
IRM
2.40%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 70.20%
- Q3
- 38.00%
- Median
- 23.98%
- Q1
- 6.53%
- Min
- -1.41%
In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
CSGP
-2.65%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 114.22%
- Q3
- 51.26%
- Median
- 23.27%
- Q1
- 7.24%
- Min
- -44.62%
CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
IRM
16.64%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 107.13%
- Q3
- 54.03%
- Median
- 42.12%
- Q1
- 16.28%
- Min
- 5.86%
In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | CSGP | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 0.24% | 85.19% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 0.20% | 0.81% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 0.66% | 2.40% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | -2.65% | 16.64% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 79.25% | 66.17% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CSGP
3.12
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 4.10
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.48
- Q1
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.04
CSGP’s Current Ratio of 3.12 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
IRM
0.66
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 1.74
- Q3
- 1.08
- Median
- 0.58
- Q1
- 0.34
- Min
- 0.10
IRM’s Current Ratio of 0.66 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
CSGP
0.12
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 2.62
- Q3
- 1.32
- Median
- 0.85
- Q1
- 0.40
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
IRM
685.59
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 5.86
- Q3
- 3.80
- Median
- 1.22
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.16
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 685.59, IRM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
CSGP
14.65
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 29.35
- Q3
- 12.97
- Median
- 3.68
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- -3.02
CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
IRM
1.36
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 5.24
- Q3
- 3.92
- Median
- 2.94
- Q1
- 2.07
- Min
- 1.14
In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | CSGP | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.12 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 2.97 | 0.55 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.12 | 685.59 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 14.65 | 1.36 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CSGP
0.00%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 6.97%
- Q3
- 3.55%
- Median
- 2.31%
- Q1
- 0.48%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
IRM
2.92%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 6.92%
- Q3
- 5.29%
- Median
- 4.71%
- Q1
- 3.25%
- Min
- 2.16%
IRM’s Dividend Yield of 2.92% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CSGP
0.00%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 310.03%
- Q3
- 143.62%
- Median
- 62.44%
- Q1
- 29.44%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
IRM
325.94%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 338.69%
- Q3
- 202.75%
- Median
- 125.21%
- Q1
- 107.89%
- Min
- 16.73%
IRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 325.94% is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | CSGP | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.92% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 325.94% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
CSGP
1,390.68
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 56.83
- Q3
- 31.11
- Median
- 15.41
- Q1
- 11.32
- Min
- 3.67
At 1,390.68, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
IRM
193.26
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 119.95
- Q3
- 64.19
- Median
- 27.78
- Q1
- 23.88
- Min
- 5.25
The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
CSGP
9.24
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 12.20
- Q3
- 5.67
- Median
- 2.73
- Q1
- 0.97
- Min
- 0.06
CSGP’s P/S Ratio of 9.24 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
IRM
4.64
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 10.35
- Q3
- 8.84
- Median
- 8.28
- Q1
- 5.39
- Min
- 1.68
In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s P/S Ratio of 4.64 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
CSGP
4.15
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 2.36
- Q3
- 1.20
- Median
- 0.75
- Q1
- 0.39
- Min
- 0.06
At 4.15, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
IRM
1,254.25
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 13.73
- Q3
- 7.48
- Median
- 2.56
- Q1
- 1.70
- Min
- 0.71
At 1,254.25, IRM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | CSGP | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 1,390.68 | 193.26 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 9.24 | 4.64 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 4.15 | 1,254.25 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 956.98 | 438.60 |
