Seek Returns logo

CSGP vs. IRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSGP and IRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that CSGP is a conventional stock, whereas IRM is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolCSGPIRM
Company NameCoStar Group, Inc.Iron Mountain Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization28.49 billion USD30.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998February 1, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSGP and IRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSGP vs. IRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSGPIRM
5-Day Price Return-3.67%-0.96%
13-Week Price Return-27.32%14.27%
26-Week Price Return-10.76%5.16%
52-Week Price Return-11.89%-12.48%
Month-to-Date Return-2.30%-0.60%
Year-to-Date Return-6.09%-2.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.04M1.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.16M1.39M
3-Month Volatility30.35%27.38%
Beta0.841.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSGP

0.24%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 0.24% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

IRM

85.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
17.78%
Median
8.42%
Q1
6.83%
Min
-1.71%

IRM’s Return on Equity of 85.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

0.66%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IRM

2.40%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
70.20%
Q3
38.00%
Median
23.98%
Q1
6.53%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

-2.65%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IRM

16.64%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
54.03%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.28%
Min
5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSGPIRM
Return on Equity (TTM)0.24%85.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.20%0.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.66%2.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.65%16.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.25%66.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

3.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 3.12 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IRM

0.66

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.08
Median
0.58
Q1
0.34
Min
0.10

IRM’s Current Ratio of 0.66 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IRM

685.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.73
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 685.59, IRM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IRM

1.36

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
3.92
Median
2.94
Q1
2.07
Min
1.14

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSGPIRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.120.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.970.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.12685.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.651.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSGP vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSGP vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IRM

2.92%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.29%
Median
4.71%
Q1
3.25%
Min
2.16%

IRM’s Dividend Yield of 2.92% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IRM

325.94%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
338.69%
Q3
202.75%
Median
125.21%
Q1
107.89%
Min
16.73%

IRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 325.94% is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSGPIRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%325.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

1,390.68

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

At 1,390.68, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IRM

193.26

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
119.95
Q3
64.19
Median
27.78
Q1
23.88
Min
5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

9.24

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

CSGP’s P/S Ratio of 9.24 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IRM

4.64

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.35
Q3
8.84
Median
8.28
Q1
5.39
Min
1.68

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s P/S Ratio of 4.64 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

4.15

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 4.15, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IRM

1,254.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
13.73
Q3
7.48
Median
2.56
Q1
1.70
Min
0.71

At 1,254.25, IRM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSGP vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSGPIRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1,390.68193.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.244.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.151,254.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)956.98438.60