Seek Returns logo

CSCO vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSCO and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CSCO is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCSCOSONY
Company NameCisco Systems, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization265.76 billion USD168.52 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateFebruary 16, 1990February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSCO and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSCO vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSCOSONY
5-Day Price Return-3.16%0.92%
13-Week Price Return4.99%15.46%
26-Week Price Return5.12%19.67%
52-Week Price Return34.27%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return-1.42%13.20%
Year-to-Date Return13.36%23.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume27.80M18.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.51M14.80M
3-Month Volatility19.17%31.61%
Beta0.981.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSCO

22.74%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CSCO’s Return on Equity of 22.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSCO

18.45%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.45% places CSCO in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSCO

21.38%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places CSCO in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSCOSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)22.74%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.58%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.45%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.56%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

1.01

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CSCO’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

0.60

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CSCO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

20.35

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

CSCO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.35 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSCOSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.011.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.921.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.600.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.35104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSCO vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSCO vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSCO

2.42%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CSCO’s Dividend Yield of 2.42% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

61.58%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CSCO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.58% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSCOSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.42%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.58%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

25.42

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

CSCO’s P/E Ratio of 25.42 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

4.69

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CSCO’s P/S Ratio of 4.69 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

5.71

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CSCO’s P/B Ratio of 5.71 is in the upper tier for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSCO vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSCOSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.4222.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.692.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.712.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.0012.66