Seek Returns logo

CSCO vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSCO and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSCOLIN
Company NameCisco Systems, Inc.Linde plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyMaterials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentChemicals
Market Capitalization313.01 billion USD196.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 16, 1990June 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSCO and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSCO vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSCOLIN
5-Day Price Return8.20%0.65%
13-Week Price Return17.82%-11.81%
26-Week Price Return26.25%-6.05%
52-Week Price Return31.80%-7.20%
Month-to-Date Return6.69%1.22%
Year-to-Date Return31.76%1.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume29.12M3.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume19.91M1.90M
3-Month Volatility22.61%15.36%
Beta0.850.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSCO

22.31%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
31.28%
Q3
24.67%
Median
13.12%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-12.73%

CSCO’s Return on Equity of 22.31% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN

18.51%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.58%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-12.53%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 18.51% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSCO

17.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
28.72%
Q3
14.02%
Median
5.41%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-13.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.90% places CSCO in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN

21.17%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.17%
Q3
9.38%
Median
4.26%
Q1
0.56%
Min
-8.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.17% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSCO

22.12%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
33.69%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-4.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.12% places CSCO in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN

27.38%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.38%
Q3
14.36%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-9.26%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.38% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSCOLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)22.31%18.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.53%8.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.90%21.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.12%27.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.85%48.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

0.93

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.28
Q3
2.10
Median
1.52
Q1
1.17
Min
0.91

CSCO’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.82

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.27
Median
1.75
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.82 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

0.60

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.96
Median
0.43
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

CSCO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.00
Median
0.65
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

22.76

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
8.92
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

CSCO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
27.42
Median
9.48
Q1
3.36
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSCOLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.930.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.600.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.7633.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSCO vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSCO vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSCO

2.10%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
2.99%
Q3
2.30%
Median
0.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CSCO’s Dividend Yield of 2.10% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN

1.42%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
3.88%
Median
2.60%
Q1
1.39%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.42% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

62.56%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
61.16%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CSCO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.56% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LIN

39.08%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
109.29%
Median
62.55%
Q1
30.93%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.08% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSCOLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.10%1.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)62.56%39.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

29.77

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
74.67
Q3
56.42
Median
31.00
Q1
15.93
Min
3.89

CSCO’s P/E Ratio of 29.77 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

27.51

Chemicals Industry

Max
48.58
Q3
28.65
Median
19.88
Q1
14.03
Min
6.73

LIN’s P/E Ratio of 27.51 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

5.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.84
Q3
5.68
Median
2.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.40

CSCO’s P/S Ratio of 5.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN

5.82

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.61
Q3
2.21
Median
0.95
Q1
0.58
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 5.82, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

6.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.02
Q3
6.01
Median
3.83
Q1
2.41
Min
0.42

CSCO’s P/B Ratio of 6.00 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN

5.77

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
2.61
Median
1.50
Q1
0.96
Min
0.33

At 5.77, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSCO vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSCOLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.7727.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.335.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.005.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.1538.44