CRWV vs. ZM: CoreWeave vs. Zoom Communications Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CoreWeave (CRWV) and Zoom Communications (ZM) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but CRWV is classified in IT Services while ZM is classified in Software.

Zoom Communications (ZM) has been public since April 18, 2019, giving it a longer listed trading history, while CoreWeave (CRWV) listed on March 28, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

CoreWeave (CRWV) carries a highly aggressive beta of 7.43, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Zoom Communications (ZM) is closer to market-like at 0.99 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative ROE of -43.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Zoom Communications (ZM) reports 32.14%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative net margin of -25.40%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Zoom Communications (ZM) reports 65.19%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative operating margin of -1.90%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Zoom Communications (ZM) reports 24.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

CoreWeave (CRWV) at 167.94% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Zoom Communications (ZM) at 4.36% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Zoom Communications (ZM) reports EPS growth of 92.52%, ranked against its industry; CoreWeave (CRWV) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Zoom Communications (ZM) at 3.83 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while CoreWeave (CRWV) at 0.46 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Zoom Communications (ZM) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while CoreWeave (CRWV) at 10.27 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither CoreWeave (CRWV) nor Zoom Communications (ZM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither CoreWeave (CRWV) nor Zoom Communications (ZM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Zoom Communications (ZM) trades at 8.34 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while CoreWeave (CRWV) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both CoreWeave (CRWV) at 3.37 and Zoom Communications (ZM) at 5.25 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

On P/B ratio, both CoreWeave (CRWV) at 5.09 and Zoom Communications (ZM) at 2.32 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics