Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRWV is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCRWVNTES
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.NetEase, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization59.67 billion USD94.99 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTES
5-Day Price Return2.59%-0.58%
13-Week Price Return-16.07%11.31%
26-Week Price Return--47.44%
52-Week Price Return--60.43%
Month-to-Date Return32.81%-1.30%
Year-to-Date Return242.13%68.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume36.23M0.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.42M0.81M
3-Month Volatility102.84%29.21%
Beta0.590.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

-61.34%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -61.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-35.73%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.73%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

7.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.69% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)-61.34%24.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.34%17.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-35.73%31.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.69%31.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.00%63.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.52

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

CRWV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.523.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.513.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.910.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.33161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES

1.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.90%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.90%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%36.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

NTES

19.44

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 19.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

16.29

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 16.29, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTES

6.06

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 6.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

20.48

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

At 20.48, CRWV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES

4.06

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRWV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--19.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.296.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.484.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--15.02