Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWVLDOS
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.Leidos Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization44.71 billion USD23.11 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025October 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVLDOS
5-Day Price Return-8.02%0.96%
13-Week Price Return5.69%12.93%
26-Week Price Return--37.90%
52-Week Price Return--19.99%
Month-to-Date Return-19.81%12.85%
Year-to-Date Return128.80%25.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume32.31M0.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume19.90M1.14M
3-Month Volatility132.94%24.66%
Beta0.400.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

-61.34%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -61.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-35.73%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.73%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

7.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.69% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVLDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)-61.34%31.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.34%10.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-35.73%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.69%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.00%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.52

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.91, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVLDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.521.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.911.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.3311.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LDOS

0.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.91% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVLDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

LDOS

16.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

10.88

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 10.88, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LDOS

1.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

20.48

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

At 20.48, CRWV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRWV vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVLDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--16.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.881.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.484.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--17.20