Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. GRAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and GRAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWVGRAB
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.Grab Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization66.27 billion USD26.05 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025December 1, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and GRAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. GRAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGRAB
5-Day Price Return-2.19%6.15%
13-Week Price Return-16.19%28.57%
26-Week Price Return154.61%40.44%
52-Week Price Return--72.70%
Month-to-Date Return-2.19%6.15%
Year-to-Date Return234.63%35.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume32.25M51.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.72M43.13M
3-Month Volatility100.86%38.69%
Beta0.600.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

-61.34%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -61.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-35.73%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.73%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

7.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.69% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGRAB
Return on Equity (TTM)-61.34%1.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.34%1.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-35.73%3.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.69%-1.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.00%42.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.52

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

CRWV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGRAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.521.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.910.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.33-3.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGRAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

GRAB

234.09

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

At 234.09, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

16.23

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 16.23, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GRAB

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 8.46, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

20.48

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

At 20.48, CRWV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRWV vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGRAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--234.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.238.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.483.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--42.67