Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRWV is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCRWVGDS
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.GDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization69.30 billion USD7.27 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGM
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGDS
5-Day Price Return1.43%-8.68%
13-Week Price Return-8.54%13.14%
26-Week Price Return160.19%50.00%
52-Week Price Return---19.97%
Month-to-Date Return2.29%-8.68%
Year-to-Date Return249.95%60.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume32.82M13.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.71M10.11M
3-Month Volatility101.86%62.60%
Beta0.602.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

-61.34%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -61.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-35.73%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.73%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

7.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.69% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)-61.34%19.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.34%6.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-35.73%42.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.69%22.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.00%21.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.52

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

CRWV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.522.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.911.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.330.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

GDS

12.16

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

16.97

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 16.97, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GDS

5.21

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.21 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

20.48

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

At 20.48, CRWV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CRWV vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--12.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.975.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.481.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)----