Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWVFTV
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesMachinery
Market Capitalization56.70 billion USD16.49 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFTV
5-Day Price Return-2.74%2.70%
13-Week Price Return101.33%-33.92%
26-Week Price Return---38.97%
52-Week Price Return---28.68%
Month-to-Date Return3.18%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return194.40%-35.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.72M5.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.38M3.85M
3-Month Volatility138.31%55.22%
Beta0.421.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

Return on Equity data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-40.67%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -40.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

10.25%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.25% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)--7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)--4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-40.67%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.25%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.91%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.44

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.44 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.86

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.86, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.440.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.430.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.860.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.336.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

19.84

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 19.84, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

5.61

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

CRWV’s P/B Ratio of 5.61 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRWV vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--21.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)19.842.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.612.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--11.83