Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWVFIS
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization56.70 billion USD38.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFIS
5-Day Price Return-2.74%3.85%
13-Week Price Return101.33%-7.75%
26-Week Price Return---12.18%
52-Week Price Return---4.41%
Month-to-Date Return3.18%-8.36%
Year-to-Date Return194.40%-9.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.72M4.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.38M3.64M
3-Month Volatility138.31%26.31%
Beta0.421.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

Return on Equity data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-40.67%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -40.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

10.25%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.25% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)--0.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)--0.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-40.67%1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.25%17.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.91%36.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.44

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.44 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.86

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.86, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.440.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.430.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.860.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.336.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%101.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

19.84

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 19.84, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

5.61

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

CRWV’s P/B Ratio of 5.61 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRWV vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--333.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)19.843.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.613.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--20.44