Seek Returns logo

CRWD vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWD and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWDGRMN
Company NameCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.Garmin Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySoftwareHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization107.71 billion USD45.54 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2019December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWD and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWD vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWDGRMN
5-Day Price Return1.68%3.33%
13-Week Price Return0.62%19.50%
26-Week Price Return2.76%7.64%
52-Week Price Return80.55%40.35%
Month-to-Date Return-4.94%8.15%
Year-to-Date Return26.29%14.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.95M0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.53M0.92M
3-Month Volatility34.38%25.11%
Beta1.161.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWD

-5.45%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRWD has a negative Return on Equity of -5.45%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWD

-4.17%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRWD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.17%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWD

-6.09%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRWD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.09%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWDGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)-5.45%19.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.13%16.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-4.17%23.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-6.09%26.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.48%58.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWD

1.85

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRWD’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWD

0.22

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRWD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

-6.83

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRWD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWDGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.853.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.761.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.220.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-6.8373.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWD vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWD vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWD

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRMN

1.35%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWDGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for CRWD is currently unavailable.

GRMN

28.70

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.70 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

25.92

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 25.92, CRWD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GRMN

6.66

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.66, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWD

30.95

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRWD’s P/B Ratio of 30.95 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRWD vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWDGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--28.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)25.926.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)30.954.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)104.5139.95