Seek Returns logo

CRWD vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWD and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWDFIS
Company NameCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization107.71 billion USD38.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2019June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWD and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWD vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWDFIS
5-Day Price Return1.68%3.85%
13-Week Price Return0.62%-7.75%
26-Week Price Return2.76%-12.18%
52-Week Price Return80.55%-4.41%
Month-to-Date Return-4.94%-8.36%
Year-to-Date Return26.29%-9.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.95M4.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.53M3.64M
3-Month Volatility34.38%26.31%
Beta1.161.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWD

-5.45%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CRWD has a negative Return on Equity of -5.45%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWD

-4.17%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CRWD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.17%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWD

-6.09%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CRWD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.09%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWDFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)-5.45%0.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.13%0.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-4.17%1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-6.09%17.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.48%36.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWD

1.85

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CRWD’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWD

0.22

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRWD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

-6.83

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CRWD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWDFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.850.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.760.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.220.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-6.836.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWD vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWD vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWD

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWDFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%101.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for CRWD is currently unavailable.

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWD

25.92

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 25.92, CRWD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWD

30.95

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CRWD’s P/B Ratio of 30.95 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRWD vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWDFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--333.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)25.923.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)30.953.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)104.5120.44