Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. XPO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and XPO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSXPO
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationXPO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningGround Transportation
Market Capitalization12.34 billion USD15.13 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 7, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and XPO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. XPO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSXPO
5-Day Price Return2.58%0.90%
13-Week Price Return-11.47%-2.75%
26-Week Price Return36.62%19.45%
52-Week Price Return56.75%19.59%
Month-to-Date Return0.81%-0.60%
Year-to-Date Return45.85%-2.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.91M1.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.97M1.21M
3-Month Volatility39.07%39.04%
Beta1.322.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XPO

20.71%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

In the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, XPO’s Return on Equity of 20.71% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XPO

4.31%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, XPO’s Net Profit Margin of 4.31% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XPO

8.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

XPO’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.35% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSXPO
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%20.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%4.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%4.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%8.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%59.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XPO

1.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

XPO’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPO

1.91

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

XPO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XPO

3.12

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

XPO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSXPO
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.651.02
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.011.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.371.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.143.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. XPO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. XPO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.33%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPO

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

XPO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPO

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

XPO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSXPO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.33%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

32.73

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 32.73 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XPO

43.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

At 43.30, XPO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XPO

1.87

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

XPO’s P/S Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the market consensus for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XPO

8.35

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.35, XPO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSXPO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.7343.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.281.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.298.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.0171.13