Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. WOR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and WOR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSWOR
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationWorthington Enterprises, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization12.45 billion USD3.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and WOR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. WOR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSWOR
5-Day Price Return-1.73%5.78%
13-Week Price Return15.44%10.75%
26-Week Price Return31.61%60.07%
52-Week Price Return79.73%54.96%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%8.10%
Year-to-Date Return47.42%67.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M0.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M0.29M
3-Month Volatility36.32%21.88%
Beta1.521.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.09%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WOR

10.42%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

WOR’s Return on Equity of 10.42% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

12.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WOR

8.33%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

WOR’s Net Profit Margin of 8.33% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

16.39%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.39% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WOR

-0.93%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

WOR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.93%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSWOR
Return on Equity (TTM)21.09%10.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.82%5.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%8.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.39%-0.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.52%27.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WOR

3.48

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

WOR’s Current Ratio of 3.48 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WOR

0.32

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

WOR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.68

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WOR

7.83

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

WOR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.83 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSWOR
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.753.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.892.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.687.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. WOR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. WOR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WOR

1.08%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WOR’s Dividend Yield of 1.08% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

15.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.03% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WOR

35.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

WOR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.30% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSWOR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%1.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.03%35.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.95

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 34.95 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WOR

32.76

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

WOR’s P/E Ratio of 32.76 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WOR

2.73

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

WOR’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

5.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.08, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WOR

3.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

WOR’s P/B Ratio of 3.14 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRS vs. WOR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSWOR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.9532.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.282.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.083.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9319.77