Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSTT
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationTrane Technologies plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningBuilding Products
Market Capitalization12.81 billion USD94.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSTT
5-Day Price Return5.21%4.42%
13-Week Price Return-11.16%-3.53%
26-Week Price Return29.83%19.85%
52-Week Price Return54.42%9.90%
Month-to-Date Return1.93%1.53%
Year-to-Date Return44.68%14.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.22M1.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.97M1.27M
3-Month Volatility38.81%25.48%
Beta1.501.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSTT
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%37.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%13.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%13.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%18.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%36.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSTT
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.651.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.010.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.1415.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.33%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSTT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.33%0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%27.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

32.94

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 32.94 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TT

33.14

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.14 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.30

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.30 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSTT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.9433.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.304.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2912.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.2933.67