Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. TDG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and TDG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSTDG
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationTransDigm Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization11.97 billion USD79.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 15, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and TDG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. TDG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSTDG
5-Day Price Return-2.59%-0.75%
13-Week Price Return1.86%-2.63%
26-Week Price Return31.07%4.96%
52-Week Price Return63.74%7.18%
Month-to-Date Return-3.73%-12.83%
Year-to-Date Return41.47%10.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.80M0.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M0.31M
3-Month Volatility35.85%29.15%
Beta1.531.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TDG

37.11%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TDG’s Return on Equity of 37.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TDG

22.52%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

TDG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TDG

45.94%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

TDG’s Operating Profit Margin of 45.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSTDG
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%37.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%8.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%22.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%45.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%60.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TDG

3.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

TDG’s Current Ratio of 3.13 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TDG

5.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.41, TDG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TDG

2.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

TDG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSTDG
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.653.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.012.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.375.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.142.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.34%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TDG

5.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TDG’s Dividend Yield of 5.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TDG

891.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 891.68%, TDG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSTDG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.34%5.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%891.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

31.90

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 31.90 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TDG

40.76

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

TDG’s P/E Ratio of 40.76 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TDG

9.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 9.18, TDG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TDG

10.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

TDG’s P/B Ratio of 10.13 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRS vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSTDG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.9040.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.179.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2910.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.9341.32