Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSRKLB
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationRocket Lab Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization16.76 billion USD23.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973November 24, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. RKLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSRKLB
5-Day Price Return0.96%-12.25%
13-Week Price Return35.92%2.87%
26-Week Price Return47.20%108.61%
52-Week Price Return86.83%141.85%
Month-to-Date Return4.62%-27.69%
Year-to-Date Return94.74%78.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.66M21.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M22.41M
3-Month Volatility56.37%80.67%
Beta1.322.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

22.68%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 22.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RKLB

-28.40%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -28.40%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

14.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-35.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

19.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.41% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-41.36%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.36%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSRKLB
Return on Equity (TTM)22.68%-28.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.19%-12.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%-35.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.41%-41.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.95%31.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

4.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

CRS’s Current Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RKLB

3.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.36

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RKLB

0.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSRKLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.443.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.372.69
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.14-45.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

12.66%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.66% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSRKLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.24%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.66%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

40.53

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

A P/E Ratio of 40.53 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKLB

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 5.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKLB

41.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 41.72, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

6.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

At 6.40, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB

18.10

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

RKLB’s P/B Ratio of 18.10 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRS vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSRKLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.53--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.8041.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.4018.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)58.61--