Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSPWR
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationQuanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization12.16 billion USD56.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSPWR
5-Day Price Return0.00%-0.25%
13-Week Price Return6.92%14.35%
26-Week Price Return14.81%29.53%
52-Week Price Return70.01%41.27%
Month-to-Date Return-3.11%-6.85%
Year-to-Date Return42.38%19.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.75M0.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M1.18M
3-Month Volatility35.57%22.83%
Beta1.521.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.651.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.011.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.1410.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.34%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.34%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

31.90

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 31.90 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.9057.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.172.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.297.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.9340.85