Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSPOOL
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationPool Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningDistributors
Market Capitalization16.76 billion USD9.08 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 13, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSPOOL
5-Day Price Return0.96%-2.63%
13-Week Price Return35.92%-24.69%
26-Week Price Return47.20%-22.79%
52-Week Price Return86.83%-31.00%
Month-to-Date Return4.62%-9.26%
Year-to-Date Return94.74%-28.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.66M0.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M0.61M
3-Month Volatility56.37%29.81%
Beta1.321.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

22.68%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 22.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

POOL

31.76%

Distributors Industry

Max
35.43%
Q3
27.95%
Median
14.57%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

In the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

14.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

POOL

7.78%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.68%
Q3
5.68%
Median
5.36%
Q1
4.87%
Min
4.81%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.78% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

19.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.41% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL

11.12%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.13%
Q3
7.77%
Median
5.57%
Q1
5.27%
Min
4.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.12% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSPOOL
Return on Equity (TTM)22.68%31.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.19%11.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%7.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.41%11.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.95%29.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

4.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

POOL

2.57

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.66
Median
1.21
Q1
1.15
Min
1.09

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.57 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.36

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

POOL

0.77

Distributors Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
1.00
Median
0.81
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSPOOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.442.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.370.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.1412.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

POOL

2.04%

Distributors Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
37.24%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.20%
Min
1.61%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 2.04% is in the lower quartile for the Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

12.66%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.66% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

POOL

44.68%

Distributors Industry

Max
903.92%
Q3
695.25%
Median
56.97%
Q1
44.33%
Min
26.53%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.68% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSPOOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.24%2.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.66%44.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

40.53

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 40.53 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

POOL

21.90

Distributors Industry

Max
27.78
Q3
22.45
Median
18.78
Q1
12.95
Min
5.82

POOL’s P/E Ratio of 21.90 is within the middle range for the Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 5.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

POOL

1.70

Distributors Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
1.07
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 1.70, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

6.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

At 6.40, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

POOL

8.39

Distributors Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.46
Median
3.12
Q1
2.75
Min
2.63

At 8.39, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSPOOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.5321.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.801.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.408.39
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)58.6120.63