CRS vs. PONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 8, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CRS and PONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRS is a standard domestic listing, while PONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CRS	PONY
Company Name	Carpenter Technology Corporation	Pony AI Inc.
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Materials	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Software
Market Capitalization	12.56 billion USD	8.32 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	November 27, 2024
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and PONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. PONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	PONY
5-Day Price Return	2.64%	4.09%
13-Week Price Return	-10.23%	88.18%
26-Week Price Return	37.94%	196.70%
52-Week Price Return	63.56%	--
Month-to-Date Return	2.64%	4.09%
Year-to-Date Return	48.49%	63.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.88M	7.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.98M	9.41M
3-Month Volatility	39.10%	69.43%
Beta	1.32	2.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 41.55%
Q3: 17.74%
Median: 9.00%
Q1: 1.65%
Min: -21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PONY

-41.07%

Software Industry

Max: 66.28%
Q3: 21.28%
Median: 9.33%
Q1: -8.77%
Min: -48.16%

PONY has a negative Return on Equity of -41.07%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 43.69%
Q3: 19.12%
Median: 6.48%
Q1: 1.50%
Min: -20.21%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PONY

-521.79%

Software Industry

Max: 51.92%
Q3: 19.23%
Median: 6.98%
Q1: -7.14%
Min: -41.00%

PONY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -521.79%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 71.84%
Q3: 32.31%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 2.69%
Min: -23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PONY

-567.77%

Software Industry

Max: 60.40%
Q3: 21.25%
Median: 9.90%
Q1: -4.97%
Min: -43.50%

PONY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -567.77%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	PONY
Return on Equity (TTM)	21.35%	-41.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.20%	-36.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	13.07%	-521.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	18.14%	-567.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	26.71%	24.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 5.27
Q3: 3.04
Median: 1.96
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PONY

6.19

Software Industry

Max: 4.29
Q3: 2.37
Median: 1.40
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

PONY’s Current Ratio of 6.19 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 1.10
Q3: 0.51
Median: 0.33
Q1: 0.09
Min: 0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PONY

0.00

Software Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.31
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

PONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 51.62
Q3: 22.73
Median: 5.76
Q1: 0.82
Min: -21.72

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PONY

Software Industry

Max: 89.65
Q3: 32.64
Median: 1.00
Q1: -9.84
Min: -71.23

Interest Coverage Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	PONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.65	6.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.01	5.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.37	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	13.14	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. PONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. PONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 8.17%
Q3: 3.57%
Median: 1.25%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.22%
Q3: 0.11%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PONY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 138.08%
Q3: 62.06%
Median: 33.17%
Q1: 10.41%
Min: 0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PONY

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 3.29%
Q3: 2.41%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PONY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	PONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.32%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.36%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

33.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 83.04
Q3: 41.69
Median: 20.30
Q1: 12.95
Min: 1.75

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 33.29 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PONY

Software Industry

Max: 145.74
Q3: 94.88
Median: 45.35
Q1: 26.66
Min: 8.80

P/E Ratio data for PONY is currently unavailable.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.35

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 9.28
Q3: 4.28
Median: 2.37
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.16

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PONY

116.86

Software Industry

Max: 25.67
Q3: 13.68
Median: 8.28
Q1: 4.95
Min: 0.90

With a P/S Ratio of 116.86, PONY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 4.68
Q3: 2.45
Median: 1.55
Q1: 0.94
Min: 0.34

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PONY

5.50

Software Industry

Max: 30.67
Q3: 14.92
Median: 8.52
Q1: 3.89
Min: 0.38

PONY’s P/B Ratio of 5.50 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. PONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	PONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	33.29	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.35	116.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.29	5.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	43.75	--