Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRS is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCRSPAC
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationGrupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization12.96 billion USD11.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSPAC
5-Day Price Return5.26%-1.30%
13-Week Price Return-6.08%-0.75%
26-Week Price Return56.08%9.88%
52-Week Price Return62.53%29.81%
Month-to-Date Return5.86%-2.23%
Year-to-Date Return53.16%15.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.82M0.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.97M0.69M
3-Month Volatility39.21%22.05%
Beta1.321.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
15.14%
Median
10.37%
Q1
6.63%
Min
1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
56.87%
Q3
32.94%
Median
20.37%
Q1
11.21%
Min
1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.60%
Q3
46.73%
Median
31.03%
Q1
15.90%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.90
Q3
1.82
Median
1.16
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.64
Median
0.83
Q1
0.27
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.45
Median
7.97
Q1
4.97
Min
2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.650.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.010.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.372.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.145.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.31%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.31% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.55%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.64%
Q3
4.96%
Median
2.38%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
206.16%
Q3
111.39%
Median
71.16%
Q1
37.58%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.31%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.74

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 34.74 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
33.87
Q3
28.56
Median
17.26
Q1
11.95
Min
6.33

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.58 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.54

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.54

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.89
Q3
5.40
Median
3.20
Q1
1.62
Min
0.87

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.00
Median
1.96
Q1
1.22
Min
0.38

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.7419.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.544.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.299.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.6618.06