Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSMMM
Company NameCarpenter Technology Corporation3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization12.16 billion USD84.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSMMM
5-Day Price Return-1.08%3.83%
13-Week Price Return5.91%6.24%
26-Week Price Return18.49%6.53%
52-Week Price Return69.84%22.82%
Month-to-Date Return-2.21%6.37%
Year-to-Date Return43.71%22.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.78M3.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M3.41M
3-Month Volatility35.77%23.75%
Beta1.521.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)21.35%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.20%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.14%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.71%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.651.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.011.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.373.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.14-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.34%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.34%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.36%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

31.90

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 31.90 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.9020.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.173.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2918.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.9330.86