Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSLUV
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationSouthwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization12.45 billion USD16.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSLUV
5-Day Price Return-1.73%4.77%
13-Week Price Return15.44%-0.96%
26-Week Price Return31.61%-0.39%
52-Week Price Return79.73%22.03%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%0.13%
Year-to-Date Return47.42%-7.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M9.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M12.50M
3-Month Volatility36.32%40.35%
Beta1.521.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.09%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

12.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

16.39%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.39% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSLUV
Return on Equity (TTM)21.09%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.82%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.39%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.52%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.68

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSLUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.750.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.890.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.689.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LUV

2.65%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.65% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

15.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.03% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSLUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.03%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.95

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 34.95 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LUV

41.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 41.16, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LUV

0.59

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

5.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.08, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSLUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.9541.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.280.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.082.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9343.02