Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. LII: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and LII, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSLII
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationLennox International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningBuilding Products
Market Capitalization12.45 billion USD21.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973July 29, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and LII by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. LII: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSLII
5-Day Price Return-1.73%3.00%
13-Week Price Return15.44%2.68%
26-Week Price Return31.61%4.49%
52-Week Price Return79.73%9.39%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%0.44%
Year-to-Date Return47.42%0.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M0.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M0.40M
3-Month Volatility36.32%30.16%
Beta1.521.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.09%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

12.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

16.39%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.39% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSLII
Return on Equity (TTM)21.09%99.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.82%24.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%15.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.39%19.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.52%33.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.68

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSLII
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.751.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.890.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.391.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.6826.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LII

0.77%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

15.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.03% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSLII
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.03%19.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.95

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 34.95 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LII

25.54

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

LII’s P/E Ratio of 25.54 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LII

3.94

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.94 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

5.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.08, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSLII
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.9525.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.283.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.0822.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9328.75