CRS vs. LECO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CRS and LECO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CRS	LECO
Company Name	Carpenter Technology Corporation	Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Machinery
Market Capitalization	11.97 billion USD	13.17 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	April 7, 1994
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and LECO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. LECO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	LECO
5-Day Price Return	-2.59%	-2.02%
13-Week Price Return	1.86%	18.49%
26-Week Price Return	31.07%	11.64%
52-Week Price Return	63.74%	22.49%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.73%	-1.97%
Year-to-Date Return	41.47%	27.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.80M	0.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.96M	0.37M
3-Month Volatility	35.85%	27.31%
Beta	1.53	1.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.35%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 31.09%
Q3: 16.14%
Median: 7.01%
Q1: 1.15%
Min: -19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LECO

37.34%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

LECO’s Return on Equity of 37.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

13.07%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 40.97%
Q3: 17.87%
Median: 7.03%
Q1: 1.82%
Min: -20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LECO

12.27%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.27% places LECO in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

18.14%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 59.48%
Q3: 26.06%
Median: 10.50%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.14% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LECO

16.67%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.67% places LECO in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	LECO
Return on Equity (TTM)	21.35%	37.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.20%	13.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	13.07%	12.27%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	18.14%	16.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	26.71%	36.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 4.81
Q3: 2.86
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LECO

1.68

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

LECO’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 1.11
Q3: 0.52
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LECO

0.91

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

LECO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Machinery industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 65.47
Q3: 29.91
Median: 5.88
Q1: 0.91
Min: -26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LECO

20.84

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

LECO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.84 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	LECO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.65	1.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.01	1.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.37	0.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	13.14	20.84

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. LECO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. LECO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.34%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 9.36%
Q3: 3.78%
Median: 1.41%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LECO

1.25%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

LECO’s Dividend Yield of 1.25% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

14.36%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 138.08%
Q3: 63.28%
Median: 38.78%
Q1: 12.84%
Min: 0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.36% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LECO

32.88%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

LECO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.88% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	LECO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.34%	1.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.36%	32.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

31.90

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 57.44
Q3: 32.87
Median: 18.04
Q1: 9.84
Min: 0.00

CRS’s P/E Ratio of 31.90 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LECO

26.26

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

LECO’s P/E Ratio of 26.26 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 3.19
Median: 1.97
Q1: 0.59
Min: 0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LECO

3.22

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

LECO’s P/S Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

7.29

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 3.92
Q3: 2.15
Median: 1.40
Q1: 0.84
Min: 0.25

At 7.29, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LECO

8.39

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

At 8.39, LECO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRS vs. LECO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CRS	LECO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	31.90	26.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.17	3.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.29	8.39
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	41.93	26.16