Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. HWM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and HWM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSHWM
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationHowmet Aerospace Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization16.76 billion USD81.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973November 1, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and HWM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. HWM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSHWM
5-Day Price Return0.96%-3.08%
13-Week Price Return35.92%18.71%
26-Week Price Return47.20%28.42%
52-Week Price Return86.83%75.60%
Month-to-Date Return4.62%-1.29%
Year-to-Date Return94.74%85.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.66M2.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M2.29M
3-Month Volatility56.37%24.72%
Beta1.321.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

22.68%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 22.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HWM

29.70%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, HWM’s Return on Equity of 29.70% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

14.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HWM

18.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

HWM’s Net Profit Margin of 18.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

19.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.41% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HWM

25.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

HWM’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.10% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSHWM
Return on Equity (TTM)22.68%29.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.19%13.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%18.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.41%25.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.95%33.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

4.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

CRS’s Current Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HWM

2.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

HWM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.36

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HWM

0.62

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

HWM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.62 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HWM

7.92

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

HWM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSHWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.442.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.370.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.62
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.147.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. HWM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. HWM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HWM

0.20%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Yield of 0.20% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

12.66%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.66% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HWM

11.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.31% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSHWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.24%0.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.66%11.31%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

40.53

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

A P/E Ratio of 40.53 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HWM

55.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

A P/E Ratio of 55.41 places HWM in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 5.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HWM

10.07

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 10.07, HWM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

6.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

At 6.40, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HWM

15.38

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

HWM’s P/B Ratio of 15.38 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRS vs. HWM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSHWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.5355.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.8010.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.4015.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)58.6162.81