Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSGPN
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationGlobal Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsFinancials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningFinancial Services
Market Capitalization12.45 billion USD20.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
5-Day Price Return-1.73%5.41%
13-Week Price Return15.44%3.99%
26-Week Price Return31.61%-22.21%
52-Week Price Return79.73%-13.91%
Month-to-Date Return0.32%8.14%
Year-to-Date Return47.42%-22.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M3.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M3.35M
3-Month Volatility36.32%38.30%
Beta1.521.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

21.09%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 21.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

12.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

16.39%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.39% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)21.09%6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.82%2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.39%23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.52%65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

CRS’s Current Ratio of 3.75 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.68

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.750.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.890.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.685.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.32%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

15.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.03% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%1.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.03%17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

34.95

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 34.95 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

4.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

5.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.08, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.9514.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.282.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.080.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.936.69