Seek Returns logo

CRS vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRS and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRSGPN
Company NameCarpenter Technology CorporationGlobal Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsFinancials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningFinancial Services
Market Capitalization16.76 billion USD17.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRS and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRS vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
5-Day Price Return0.96%-2.09%
13-Week Price Return35.92%-14.61%
26-Week Price Return47.20%-10.45%
52-Week Price Return86.83%-36.15%
Month-to-Date Return4.62%-4.69%
Year-to-Date Return94.74%-33.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.66M2.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M2.36M
3-Month Volatility56.37%31.70%
Beta1.320.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRS

22.68%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 22.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GPN

7.79%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 7.79% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

14.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GPN

19.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 19.68% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRS

19.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.41% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN

28.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 28.22% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)22.68%7.79%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.19%3.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%19.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.41%28.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.95%67.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

4.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

CRS’s Current Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GPN

0.85

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

0.36

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GPN

0.71

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.440.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.370.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.145.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRS vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRS vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRS

0.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN

1.39%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.39% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRS

12.66%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.66% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GPN

13.82%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.82% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.24%1.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.66%13.82%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRS

40.53

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

A P/E Ratio of 40.53 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GPN

9.96

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 9.96 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRS

5.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 5.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GPN

1.96

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRS

6.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

At 6.40, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN

0.89

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.89 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRSGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.539.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.801.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.400.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)58.618.07